亚洲AV

Discussing Dobbs: Scholars on both sides of abortion debate discuss new Supreme Court ruling

Body

On the heels of the landmark Supreme Court decision involving abortion, 亚洲AV鈥檚 will host a webinar on the opinions in Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization and their legal impact on Thursday, July 21, at 7 p.m.

Portrait of Helen Alvare
Helen聽Alvar茅 will moderate a discussion on Dobbs v. Jackson at the law school on July 21.聽

The webinar, moderated by Associate Dean for Academic Affairs , will feature , a pro-choice attorney who argued on behalf of Planned Parenthood in the聽Casey聽case, which affirmed Roe鈥檚 holding about a constitutional right to legal abortion, and , a pro-life attorney and author of numerous books and articles on pro-life feminism.

鈥淭his is a national legal conversation of great importance,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥淲e [at Mason and the law school] are regularly part of such conversations and we pride ourselves on giving students very high-level tools for participating in all sides of a question.鈥

Students, faculty, staff, and the broader community are welcome to register. After the panelists speak and query each other on the Dobbs decision, its legal impact and what comes next, participants will have the opportunity to ask the panelists questions.

鈥淭here will be an opportunity to discuss not only the majority opinion, but super interesting concurrences and a dissent,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥Each of them, if you鈥檙e a lawyer in this arena, is worth the price of admission.鈥

Headshot of Erika Bachiochi.
Pro-life attorney Erika Bachiochi is one of the event panelists.聽

If attendees took one thing away from this event, what would you hope for that to be?

鈥淎cknowledging the substantial and best arguments on both sides,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥淐learly, there are good arguments on both sides of this debate or it would not have persisted鈥攏ot just for 49 years, but in the years before聽Roe.

鈥淲e want [the panelists] to get at the best legal arguments on both sides and to convey them in a way that the audience will understand that they鈥檙e substantial, and nobody can take a position without intelligently grappling with the arguments on the other side.鈥

What excites you about the panelists?

鈥淜itty argued the聽颁补蝉别测听decision, and I watched her argue it,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥淔rankly, she won that case. She lost some pieces鈥Roe聽was altered. But she preserved a constitutional right to abortion, and she was the far superior advocate.聽She鈥檚 formidable.鈥

鈥淓rika is a sophisticated and prolific legal scholar who has occupied her time writing in-depth books and academic articles,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥淗er most recent book concerns the feminism of Mary Wollstonecraft. Erika is marvelous at maintaining dialogue with people who could not differ more on the subject. She鈥檚 funny, she鈥檚 quick. Kitty, too. Both of them are such marvelous, positive, intelligent and fun personalities.鈥

What are the panelists looking forward to?

Headshot of Kathryn Kitty Kolbert
Pro-choice attorney Kathryn (Kitty) Kolbert will speak at the Antonin Scalia Law School on July 21.

鈥淸I鈥檓 looking forward to] a thoughtful conversation about the impact of Dobbs on women鈥檚 health and autonomy and its effect on the institutional integrity of the Supreme Court,鈥 Kolbert said.

鈥淚鈥檓 eager to discuss how pro-choice and pro-life feminists can work together for the sake of poor women and their children,鈥 Bachiochi added.

How does this event speak to Mason鈥檚 values?

The goal, as with all discussions at Mason, is to provide a space for a civilized and substantive discussion where both sides are being heard and discussed rationally and deeply, Alvar茅 said.

One of our contributions here is the effort to bring peace and civility,鈥 Alvar茅 said. 鈥淲e take great pride in the fact that we not only allow, but encourage and foment the full airing of both sides of an argument.鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 the service we offer our students, our alums, and the community,鈥 she said.